Janet Jackson Might Get Custody Of Michael’s Kids
Janet Jackson may end up raising Michael Jackson‘s three children, Prince, Paris and Blanket.
A Jackson family friend spilled to OK!, “All three want Janet to read to them at night. They just melt into her arms when she walks into the house.”
And Janet isn’t about to let the kids go either. “Janet has completely bonded with those children in the last two weeks,” the friend said. “She has been their rock. It’s clear to everyone that they are looking to her for comfort and guidance.”
Although Michael named his mother Katherine as the children’s guardian in his last will, many are concerned that the 79-year-old can’t handle raising three young children. She has temporary guardianship until the next court date on August 3.
The source says that Janet thinks she can provide the best environment for the kids.
“Janet is not only willing to raise those children, she is also the only relative who knows how to protect them. Janet knows the value of a private life and knows how to keep her personal life out of the news. She is determined to do that for Michael’s children. She is saying that he would want no less for them, pointing out how far he went to shelter them.”
Have your say in the comments section: Who do you think should raise the kids: Joe Jackson, Katherine, Debbie Rowe or Janet?
[quote=Pops Warner]“Blanket.” It’s gonna be tough going through life with a name that stupid.[/quote]
blanket is a nick name…
Janet would be the perfect one to raise those children! Those of you that take the time to make fun of names and such….what does the names have to do with having someone wonderful to raise them? Names have nothing to do with children needing cared for and loved. And who better to do that job, than Janet? That would be wonderful!!!
how come so many people are hating on the Jackson Family I net they wish they were related
Janet should take care of the three children. Katherine would have a difficult time getting up there in age. JOe… No!! I think he would exploit them for for his own selfish means. Debbie No! She said she don’t like tending to children.
This whole thing is stupid. It is none of our business who gets to raise those kids. Leave Janet alone. What happened at the Super Bowl was a terrible misfortune and I am sure it was not intentional. Give Janet and the family a break. The rest of us should just mind our own business.
I hope Janet do get the kids….it won’t be no problem with her man he have a child also that Janet love’s
I hope Janet do get the kids….it won’t be no problem with her man he have a child also that Janet love’s
The whole situation is just so sad. I think Janet is the perfect person to raise her niece and nephews, because as someone mentioned in an earlier post, she would know better than anyone in the family – how to protect them.
And, sure, she’s got a significant other, but in a circumstance of this nature, no one should be sitting around waiting for the fate of these children to depend on his approval.
If he really loves Janet, he’ll be a gentleman about it all, and offer to help in any way that he can. If he doesn’t, I’m sure Janet wouldn’t have a great deal of difficulty showing him where the door is.
To the Jacksons: I relay my sincere prayers and blessings to you all. I hope you all find the light at the end of the tunnel soon. R.I.P. M.J.J. If love could have saved you, you’d have lived forever…
PLEASE, LEAVE ALONE THESE POOR KIDS! LET A JUDGE &
KIDS DECIDE WHOM THEY CHOOSE TO LIVE WITH FOR THE REST OF THEIR YOUNG LIFE. THESE KIDS AT THIS POINT THE MONEY IS NOT THEIR WORY JUST SAFE HOUSE
& INVIROMENT THEY ACUSTEMED TO, AND A LOT OF LOVE.
I THINK JANET MIGHT HAVE THAT QAULITY FOR THOSE
BEAUTIFUL POOR KIDS.
[quote=noah]Does she get custody over Macaulay Culkin as well?I wonder how Mila Kunis feels dating Mac, knowing that she’s getting Michael Jackson’s sloppy seconds?[/quote]
That so damn stupid of you to say..yall made fun of michael the whole time he was living and cracked mean stupid jokes about him now that he is dead have some damn respect and let him rest you stupid bastard im so sick of people still bad talking him leave him the hell alone let him rest in peace no one needs to hear or read your stupid ass senseless comments!!!! Wanna Be Startin Something!!! You Can Just Beat It Fool!!!
[quote=Pops Warner]“Blanket.” It’s gonna be tough going through life with a name that stupid.[/quote]
Thats the name the freakin media gave him thats not his real name. Its something like a nickname!!!
OMG!! Finally the day he died and the media was saying they didnt know what was going to happen to the kids and i said to myself I hop Janet get the kids and the day i watched the memorial service i seen blanket hiding under janet or was it letoya’s arm i said to my self i sure hope janet or letoya could get the kids and when i see paris reach out and grab janet i knew then she would be so good to them. I think Debbie Rowe should just get away the kids hardly even know her why would they want to live with her?!?! What makes her think they would want to live with her?!?!!
[quote=gorillagilla]c’mon MRS. Jackson if your nasty!!! Boobiegate on Superbowl now all of the sudden she’s wonderful. Please!!![/quote]
Janet is a wonderful person and the superbowl was a mistake justin timberlake snatched her thing the wrong it wasnt suppose to happen like that and if it was people make mistakes and janet is a wonderful a very wonderful person and its so stupid that you would bring up the suckish as bullsh*t about the superbowl keep that to your self let the past stay in the past.
If MJ was gay, so what. There are many homosexuals and they are excepted by society. Mj should be no different. What should matter is the great things he did when he was alive, and the great contributions he made to society not only with his great talent, but with his charities.
But I guess no one will ever see his positive side, because making money seems all that matters to the people who write this trash about MJ care about is making money of MJ even after he has passed away. The next time the tabloids write anything about MJ I hope they write that MJ was in the Guiness Book of Records for the celebrity who gave the most charity in the world.
Britain has the bad habit of criticizing Americans. I am a college student and when I read article in English class, it is usually about British authors criticising the American’s way of life and our customs. Instead of writing stories about MJ having homosexual encounters as they wrot in the Sun, they should write about George Michaels and remind every one of when he was arrested for committing lewd homosexual acts with a fellow homosexual in an airport restroom sometime in the 90s. Or how Prince Charles whored around with Cmilla Parker Bulls while married to The Princess Diana.
[quote=Pops Warner]“Blanket.” It’s gonna be tough going through life with a name that stupid.[/quote]
You need to be quiet….. remember you are talking about a child dummy,,,,,,Jealousy gets you no where….. You are probably mad because your parents did not have a nickname for you…. oh, yes they did, STUPID…….
I totally agree that Janet Jackson should raise MJs children. I think that is what the children want to happen also. I realized this on MJs memorial service, because of the way they were clinging to Janet. I think she would really take good care of them, and it would also be great for Janet because I don’t think she has children of her own. Therefore it would be good for Janet and the 3 children. I definately don’t think they should go with that GOLD DIGGING, TRAILER TRASH biological mother, all she wants from those kids is another humungous pay day. Furthermore, MJ would roll over in his grave if that were to occur.
I don’t think they should go with Katherine either because she is too elderly to take on the reasponsibility of 3 young children , and also they should not be around that money hungrry beast, Joe Jackson, who beat MJ excessively when he was a child. Furthermore, all JOE would want from those children is to make money from them. I f JOE did not give a darn about MJ, what makes anyone think he can care about 3 kids that are not even his biological grand children?
Besides what would stop JOE from abusing the children if Katherine is submissive to JOE and would probably not intervine when it is happpening. She would probably allow the abuse as she did when JOE abused their 9 children. I would not trust that man especially with Paris, because according to LaToya, he sexually abused her and Katherine would allow it.
Rest in peace my angel MJ.
Ilove you so much.
My only regret is not having met you before you abruptly left us.
May God bless and rest your beautiful soul….
[quote=noah]Does she get custody over Macaulay Culkin as well?
I wonder how Mila Kunis feels dating Mac, knowing that she’s getting Michael Jackson’s sloppy seconds?[/quote]
WTF IS WRONG WITH U?! U R NOT ONLY A COLD HEARTED PERSON BUT JUST PLAIN RUDE!!! WHY THE HELL WOULD YOU MAKE A COMMENT LIKE THAT?! STOP BEING SO INSENSITIVE AND KEEP THE “SMART REMARKS” TO YOURSELF.
Janet would be good role person for MJ kids for mainly protection.
OMG JANET JACKSON WOULD BE PERFECT
I pray to g-d that Janet takes those kids. Ms. Katherine is a great grandmother but shes to old to raise them and for joe jackson he should just leave those kids alone like michael wanted…we love you michael and we will miss you but your legency will go on forever
Me of course, I have no family issue. That is a very unstable family…..I raised four children and they have all turned out to be very stable…….
Janet Jackson will be good for the children. she will make sure that Micheal wishes for the children is carry out. I love Katherine Jackson. She will also be good but She is older and have a lot of other grandchildren to look after. I will make sure she and Janet can have joint custody in case Janet have to work . Her mom can be there for the Kids.
Janet Jackson if she Really has Time, and Truly loves Micheal Kids and they Truly LOVE HER!!! I Can see this.. and it feels Right.. And the others can visit.. I Think Janet would BE a GREAT Mom, and Micheal would be Happy Let it be GOD’s Will!!!!!!!
I’m glade Janet is stepping up to the plate. She will be great for the children. I think she will give of her self and raise those children with much love and understanding. They have been put in the public eye knowing that their father would have had a fit. No-one had any respect for the proviacy of those children at a time like this. No one concidered the private hell they are going through right now. They just through them all up in the public’s face. I pray for all of them. God knows who and what they need .I pray he keeps them in his heart and that all the right decisions that are made are truly best for them. That so called mother needs to crawl back under her rock and stay there.
Janet is the only one in that fa,ily that can offer the children the life they are use to. Traveling, nice places, privacy, all things that Michael would want, and did have for them. Debbie rowe is the mother of only 2 of the children, and I don’t think they should be split up, besides it appears like she took money for having thoses kids, they do not even know her. Michael’s mother is too old, and apparently influences by her jerk, money sucking, living off Michael’s money for years husband. I wish the brothers and sisters of Michael would stop taking money for interviews, and some of Michael’s so called friends, it makes them all look like leaches. If they all loved him so much, they could have helped him, instead of taking his money. Those children deserve all the money, not anyone else.
Janet, who showed her love for the children in the protective way she held them, she showed great dignity in what was made into a side show. Also, she is definately not in it for the money. She has shown over and over that she is the only Jackson whose mental state is stable. I believe she would make a wonderful mother-aunt. She has class and I believe she is well grounded in the real world.
oh pls, janet amst did paris eat teh microhone at the memorial HAHAHAHAH
and michael is alive. open iyour eyes, god damn.
[quote=Pops Warner]“Blanket.” It’s gonna be tough going through life with a name that stupid.[/quote]
what are you mentally retarded or ignorant Blanket is a nickname the media and michael gave him because we never really saw him without the blanket covering his face his name is Prince Michael II
blanket is his pet name cuz he never leaves home without his blanket, his real name is Michael prince jackson
[quote=noah]Does she get custody over Macaulay Culkin as well?I wonder how Mila Kunis feels dating Mac, knowing that she’s getting Michael Jackson’s sloppy seconds?[/quote]
Wow! You need to grow up! You’re like so NOT funny.
[quote=Pops Warner]“Blanket.” It’s gonna be tough going through life with a name that stupid.[/quote]
his name is prince michael, blanket is his nickname
[quote=Sue]Janet but what does her partner think?[/quote]
Who cares what her “partner” thinks!! Blood is thicker than water.
Janet is the best candidate for guardianship for the following reason:
True, she knows how to keep her personal life separate from her professional life.
True, she is younger than her mother (of course) or Diana Ross.
True, she is the only party outside MJ’s wishes that is not in need of money.
Finally, if everyone has noticed she is the one person staying out of the media in reference to her brother death/kids.
Any objectors!!!
[quote=Pops Warner]“Blanket.” It’s gonna be tough going through life with a name that stupid.[/quote]
Shut the hell up you stupid ass
Shut up you stupid ass. You shouldn’t talk about anyone’s name. How would you feel if someone didn’t like the nickname you gave your child. Mind your own damn business.
janet can keep the kids
janet jackson can take good care of the kids
Gandmother’s, take care of everybody. Kids, grandchildren, greatgrand children, family and friends, cause she has that special love that she’s blessed with, no matter what age she is
and that is what MJ’s children need a special love during this time. I believe katherine would be great with those children. While she is taking care of them the rest of the family will love and take care of them as well, people please stop going alone with everthing you hear or read. This family is like the rest of us they have feeling and concern about what people are saying. They love their family, just as we love ours. All of the “Jackson Family” will be there for the children….. S. Millage
[quote=susanmillage]Gandmother’s, take care of everybody. Kids, grandchildren, greatgrand children, family and friends, cause she has that special love that she’s blessed with, no matter what age she isand that is what MJ’s children need a special love during this time. I believe katherine would be great with those children. While she is taking care of them the rest of the family will love and take care of them as well, people please stop going alone with everthing you hear or read. This family is like the rest of us they have feeling and concern about what people are saying. They love their family, just as we love ours. All of the “Jackson Family” will be there for the children….. S. Millage[/quote]
[quote=Pops Warner]“Blanket.” It’s gonna be tough going through life with a name that stupid.[/quote]
Its OBVIOUSLY his nickname! Dumbass !!
[quote=jessica K.]gosh it must be tough going through life being that stupid. “Blanket” is a nickname, nothing official. Calm.[/quote]
ok. Micheal gave his child tht name cuz it was a saying tht he used frequently. Which means to bless someone or something. Go on YouTube and it will say thts why he gave his child the name Blanket. PS He said it when he was on tht documentary “Living with Michael Jackson” IDK wht part it is but its on there. ND STOP TALKNG BOUT HIS CHILDREN! THIS IS THE REASON HE SHELTERED HIS CHILDREN SO PPL WOULDNT HURT THEM!
i love janet so much and i hope she is the one to raise paris prine michel and blaket they need er