VIDEO: Stephenie Meyer Says There Should Be 5 Twilight Movies

VIDEO: Stephenie Meyer Says There Should Be 5 Twilight Movies-photo

You've heard it folks, straight from the Twilight author's mouth.

Boo Boo Stewart isn't the only person who thinks that the fourth Vampire flick, Breaking Dawn, should be split into two movies.

In a new interview, Stephenie Meyer was asked "if all four of the Books are made into movies, which would you most look forward to work on?

Meyer responds, "If they do all four - I really think they have to do five movies, cause I don't think you can do Breaking Dawn in one movie, You have to split it up. You do it right, well you do it in two."

Readers, have your say in the comments section: Do you think that Breaking Dawn should be broken up into two films?

 

Discuss

Default avatar
  • Maddy
    Maddy

    Absolutely not. If you cut out all the filler crap in that book, there's barely enough to do just one movie. Meyer is just trying to be like J.K. Rowling and failing miserably.

  • Shanda Butler
    Shanda Butler

    I think it should be one big movie like they did with Lords of the rings the last on one movie 2 parts. Away their only doing four movies I read it some where . Can't wait

  • noseovertail
    noseovertail

    I suggest a "Grind House" double feature sort of thing make it long like the Lord of The Rings trilogies and let these actors get on with there lives...

  • Pamela
    Pamela

    Yeah. Breaking Dawn should be two movies and it'd be way more suspenseful for the viewers if they stopped at a really, like, critical part. And, if they do two, less scenes will probably be cut...which is good.

  • cookie
    cookie

    Breaking Dawn barely has enough to make one cohesive movie, but I imagine it will have two parts because it will make more money. However, I still think two movies is a joke. Stephenie Meyer thinks a bit too highly of herself and her "writing" abilities, imo.

  • freJAMACARONS
    freJAMACARONS

    here is the translation "my name is stephanie myer and i know that my books are really popular, and that none of my new ones, like the host are ever going to be that popular, so i may as well milk the system and get as much money out of it as possible and try and keep my name in the spotlight for as long as i can, because in three years i will be just like j.k rowling, with no popularity anymore".

  • Candice
    Candice

    I could definatley see them doing it as two, if you have read the book then you would know there is bella's story and Jacob's story. If they split it that way for the movie too that would be good. Although i am sure many people wouldnt mind sitting down to watch a 3-4 hour breaking dawn movie if it was done as 1

  • omg
    omg

    no they shouldn't, cos rpattz and everyone will grow up a bit, they need to finish as fast as possible, or itll ruin it, because vampires and werewolfs aren't supposed to age, and sooner or latrer they'll look to grown to hide it

  • omg
    omg

    yeah totally...imean, if they do just 1 movie, then they will cut out more scenes than they should have...if they do two, the movie might be less-cut and owh-so r0mantic and C0OL!! you love skandar, i do too, i thought, nobody knew him, he's only in the narnia movies and he lives in england, but i guess not.

  • aizawest1
    aizawest1


    =======PR0===F==I==L==E============== =MY=VIDEOS=TO==WATCH==FOR==FREE!!!!======


  • sissia
    sissia

    hahaha imagine middle aged rpattz trying to play a 17 year old years from now.... omg, that's a little sad, right? you're totally right!twilight should finish as soon as they can, cauz actorss are grpwing.robert can't be 26 and play an 17year old adolescent.

  • sissia
    sissia

    woawww that sounds a lot like HARRY POTTER.............. agree!!

  • sissi
    sissi

    Tss commercial crap. If Harry Potter ends in 2 movies (read: 2 blockbusters instead of 1), Twilight has to as well? The only movie that merited a split (one story, two movies) was Kill Bill. yeah i think she wants her story to be split in two movies like harry potter would be.there's no reason, harry potter and the deathly hallows has much more importnant things to show.

  • guest
    guest

    Stephanies such a rip from harry potter, and i hate her for it. She'll never be as good as JK rowling and should just stop. trying. Twilight isn't worthy of two movies like HP

  • obsessed
    obsessed

    sure why not more robert XD

  • Vanessa
    Vanessa

    It's a great idea. If they keep it as one movie, they are going to have to edit and cut a lot of stuff out because the book had so much in it!

  • daiana
    daiana

    absolutely!!!

  • Cullen_Love
    Cullen_Love

    i would rather it be 1 whole movie. i'd sit in the theater for as long as it takes. im not patient enough to have to wait for the 2nd part to come out.

  • bigsu
    bigsu

    I think Breaking Dawn is so long (3 books) It should be cut in 2 movies. Unless, the film will lake of many details.

  • Erica
    Erica

    Yes, it's essentially two books anyways. There might not be as much action as in the first three books, but there is no way you can do a good job with Breaking Dawn within a two or two and a half hour period. There is too much going on for that. I don't think even three hours will do it justice, after all it is the last book. I think the best thing to do is split it into two movies. Besides, the screen writer can always add action sequences or whatever it is that fans are looking for.

  • anonymous.me
    anonymous.me

    hahaha imagine middle aged rpattz trying to play a 17 year old years from now.... omg, that's a little sad, right?

  • guest
    guest

    I think they should cut their losses and just stop making crap movies.

  • ana
    ana

    woawww that sounds a lot like HARRY POTTER..............

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous

    Just do it in one movie and make it a 3 hr long. I am sure no one would mind.

  • Isabella
    Isabella

    There doesn't happen that much in Breaking Dawn, so they should do one movie

  • SKANDARsgirl
    SKANDARsgirl

    yeah totally... imean, if they do just 1 movie, then they will cut out more scenes than they should have...if they do two, the movie might be less-cut and owh-so r0mantic and C0OL!!

  • tatts09
    tatts09

    i was hoping that breaking dawn would just be 1 whole movie..i belive some people as well as myself hate watching movies that end at the excting part..then we all have have to wait another year or so for the 2nd part..

  • tatts09
    tatts09

    omg..are they really gonna do it?so the 2nd part of breaking dawn will be in 2013..??geez..that's really sad..

  • Cayleigh
    Cayleigh

    This is not a "new" interview. This interview is more than a year old--it happened when Breaking Dawn was released.

  • Bee
    Bee

    Tss commercial crap. If Harry Potter ends in 2 movies (read: 2 blockbusters instead of 1), Twilight has to as well? The only movie that merited a split (one story, two movies) was Kill Bill.

  • escomesco
    escomesco

    absolutely should:))

  • Sonia Goldenberg
    Sonia Goldenberg

    I think yes, it should.

 
celebuzz