VIDEO: Stephenie Meyer Says There Should Be 5 Twilight Movies
You've heard it folks, straight from the Twilight author's mouth.
Boo Boo Stewart isn't the only person who thinks that the fourth Vampire flick, Breaking Dawn, should be split into two movies.
In a new interview, Stephenie Meyer was asked "if all four of the Books are made into movies, which would you most look forward to work on?
Meyer responds, "If they do all four - I really think they have to do five movies, cause I don't think you can do Breaking Dawn in one movie, You have to split it up. You do it right, well you do it in two."
Readers, have your say in the comments section: Do you think that Breaking Dawn should be broken up into two films?
Absolutely not. If you cut out all the filler crap in that book, there's barely enough to do just one movie. Meyer is just trying to be like J.K. Rowling and failing miserably.
I think it should be one big movie like they did with Lords of the rings the last on one movie 2 parts. Away their only doing four movies I read it some where . Can't wait
I suggest a "Grind House" double feature sort of thing make it long like the Lord of The Rings trilogies and let these actors get on with there lives...
Yeah. Breaking Dawn should be two movies and it'd be way more suspenseful for the viewers if they stopped at a really, like, critical part. And, if they do two, less scenes will probably be cut...which is good.
Breaking Dawn barely has enough to make one cohesive movie, but I imagine it will have two parts because it will make more money. However, I still think two movies is a joke. Stephenie Meyer thinks a bit too highly of herself and her "writing" abilities, imo.
here is the translation "my name is stephanie myer and i know that my books are really popular, and that none of my new ones, like the host are ever going to be that popular, so i may as well milk the system and get as much money out of it as possible and try and keep my name in the spotlight for as long as i can, because in three years i will be just like j.k rowling, with no popularity anymore".
I could definatley see them doing it as two, if you have read the book then you would know there is bella's story and Jacob's story. If they split it that way for the movie too that would be good. Although i am sure many people wouldnt mind sitting down to watch a 3-4 hour breaking dawn movie if it was done as 1
no they shouldn't, cos rpattz and everyone will grow up a bit, they need to finish as fast as possible, or itll ruin it, because vampires and werewolfs aren't supposed to age, and sooner or latrer they'll look to grown to hide it
yeah totally...imean, if they do just 1 movie, then they will cut out more scenes than they should have...if they do two, the movie might be less-cut and owh-so r0mantic and C0OL!! you love skandar, i do too, i thought, nobody knew him, he's only in the narnia movies and he lives in england, but i guess not.
=======PR0===F==I==L==E============== =MY=VIDEOS=TO==WATCH==FOR==FREE!!!!======
hahaha imagine middle aged rpattz trying to play a 17 year old years from now.... omg, that's a little sad, right? you're totally right!twilight should finish as soon as they can, cauz actorss are grpwing.robert can't be 26 and play an 17year old adolescent.
woawww that sounds a lot like HARRY POTTER.............. agree!!
Tss commercial crap. If Harry Potter ends in 2 movies (read: 2 blockbusters instead of 1), Twilight has to as well? The only movie that merited a split (one story, two movies) was Kill Bill. yeah i think she wants her story to be split in two movies like harry potter would be.there's no reason, harry potter and the deathly hallows has much more importnant things to show.
Stephanies such a rip from harry potter, and i hate her for it. She'll never be as good as JK rowling and should just stop. trying. Twilight isn't worthy of two movies like HP
sure why not more robert XD
It's a great idea. If they keep it as one movie, they are going to have to edit and cut a lot of stuff out because the book had so much in it!
absolutely!!!
i would rather it be 1 whole movie. i'd sit in the theater for as long as it takes. im not patient enough to have to wait for the 2nd part to come out.
I think Breaking Dawn is so long (3 books) It should be cut in 2 movies. Unless, the film will lake of many details.
Yes, it's essentially two books anyways. There might not be as much action as in the first three books, but there is no way you can do a good job with Breaking Dawn within a two or two and a half hour period. There is too much going on for that. I don't think even three hours will do it justice, after all it is the last book. I think the best thing to do is split it into two movies. Besides, the screen writer can always add action sequences or whatever it is that fans are looking for.
hahaha imagine middle aged rpattz trying to play a 17 year old years from now.... omg, that's a little sad, right?
I think they should cut their losses and just stop making crap movies.
woawww that sounds a lot like HARRY POTTER..............
Just do it in one movie and make it a 3 hr long. I am sure no one would mind.
There doesn't happen that much in Breaking Dawn, so they should do one movie
yeah totally... imean, if they do just 1 movie, then they will cut out more scenes than they should have...if they do two, the movie might be less-cut and owh-so r0mantic and C0OL!!
i was hoping that breaking dawn would just be 1 whole movie..i belive some people as well as myself hate watching movies that end at the excting part..then we all have have to wait another year or so for the 2nd part..
omg..are they really gonna do it?so the 2nd part of breaking dawn will be in 2013..??geez..that's really sad..
This is not a "new" interview. This interview is more than a year old--it happened when Breaking Dawn was released.
Tss commercial crap. If Harry Potter ends in 2 movies (read: 2 blockbusters instead of 1), Twilight has to as well? The only movie that merited a split (one story, two movies) was Kill Bill.
absolutely should:))
I think yes, it should.