Rihanna Will Only Pose Nude in a 'Classy' Way

Rihanna Will Only Pose Nude in a 'Classy' Way-photo

Sorry, gentlemen; you won't be seeing Rihanna posing in the buff anytime soon. At least not in the pages of Playboy.

The Rated R songstress revealed to Hot 97's The Angie Martinez Show on Wednesday that she's received several offers to pose for Hugh Hefner's venerable skin magazine, and has turned them down every time.

The good news? Ri-Ri isn't opposed to getting naked for the camera—as long as it's done in the  proper, respectful context:

“I got a few offers to do Playboy actually. They want to pay [me] to be naked on the cover. If I’m gonna take my clothes off, it has to be in a classy way and my will, not a check. I wouldn’t take any money to do that.”

Rihanna: Nudism with principles.

Do you agree with Ri-Ri's stance on posing in the altogether? Let us know in the comments section.



Default avatar
  • ririfan

    I sort of see what she means, because it's about her intentions, what she wants her nude pictures to tell the audience. If it's shown in playboy it's pretty obvious that she wants to show that her body's a toy and that it's meant to turn people on. However, the nude posing she's doing nowadays send out a different message (don't know what though). Perhaps she wants to show that she only does nude posing when she wants to by doing it in a way that says "f*ck you haters, i look good and i'm proud of it, look who's hardcore now biatch." something like that. still, if we look at it objectively, nude posing is nude posing. same sh*t. there's no classy way of being naked, because being naked is just not classy in any way. I dunno, maybe the "classy" she's talking about is the photoshoot setting, the way they set everything up in the background.

  • Brianna

    There's a difference between posing for PlayBoy and posing for Essence.