You Decide: Did Taylor Swift Get a Boob Job?
Reports have swirled that the super-hot singer went under the knife.
taylor swift at people's choice awards 2013
taylor's style evolution
In Touch magazine, for one, reported that the 23-year-old singer had a breast augmentation.
The magazine even spoke to Dr. Michael Fiorillo, a NYC plastic surgeon who has not treated Swift. His take on the situation: “Scarring like this sometimes happens right after an augmentation.”
But not everyone agrees.
Celebuzz spoke exclusively to Dr. John Diaz, a Beverly Hills-based plastic surgeon and breast surgery specialist.
“I can see the unusual-shaped mark on the breast in the picture," he said. "Based on the appearance of the shape and the location, it is unlikely a scar from surgery.”
“If Taylor had breast surgery, you would see a scar directly on the areola, or you would see a linear horizontal scar along the bottom crease of her breast. Thus, it is almost certainly not a scar from any kind of breast surgery."
another awards show appearance: taylor at the golden globes
“It is probably tape to secure her dress to her breasts," agreed Dr. Diaz, who also hasn't treated Swift. "Sometimes B cup breasts can have a fuller appearance if a bra or fabric tape is used."
Swift's rep didn't return calls for comment.
Do you think Taylor had a boob job, or is she still au naturale? Let us know in the comments section.
She either had a boob job or recently got a good padded wonder bra.
They still look dang small to me, no way did she get a boob job.
No augmentation. A girl's body is not fully mature until her mid- to late-20's; she's just growing up.
I think so, it's not just the scar that makes her look like she's had one, if you look at the before and after pictures you can tell. It's only a subtle though
That is really a stretch. No, it's not a boob job. Anybody who thinks so is an idiot.
Looks like some sweat or a shadow. No need to jump for the surgery thing every time something looks off.
Oh good grief. It doesn't look like a surgery scar, it looks like a rash. Like maybe there was some tape there and she is allergic. I am allergic to tape/adhesives and I will get a rash like that. If that was a surgery scar she would have a reason to sue the Dr. Why do people jump to conclusions over the dumbest things?? Edit - After going thru the gallery pictures it is clear that the mark is a shadow. Funny how the mark moved from boob to boob and up to her chest depending on how she was standing and how the light hit the dress. In this pic it looks like a rash but in the others you can clearly see that it is simply a shadow. For Pete's sake.