Dylan Farrow Responds to Woody Allen's 'Outright Lies'
Mere hours after Woody Allen publicly defended himself against the decades old molestation allegations against him, Dylan Farrow released her newest rebuttal to The Hollywood Reporter.
It's been just a week since Dylan released her open letter to The New York Times, the letter which detailed the alleged sexual abuse she survived at the hands of Allen more than twenty years ago. And although the accusations weren't new, the details were and they have put the spotlight on the way Hollywood handles or avoids these types of scandals.
Just yesterday, because he couldn't avoid it any longer, the Oscar Winner responded with his own letter to the Times.
Naturally, his version of events differ greatly from Dylan's, even going as far to accuse her mother, and his ex-wife, Mia Farrow, of planting the entire story in Dylan's head.
That brings us up to speed and to Dylan's newest public statement, which serves as her response to Woody's letter. And although he didn't blame her for any of this, Dylan still believes that Woody is actively trying to "discredit and silence" her with "the same legalese, distortions, and outright lies" he has leveled against her for the past 20 years.
You can read Dylan's full response below:
Once again, Woody Allen is attacking me and my family in an effort to discredit and silence me - but nothing he says or writes can change the truth. For 20 years, I have never wavered in describing what he did to me. I will carry the memories of surviving these experiences for the rest of my life.
His op-ed is the latest rehash of the same legalese, distortions, and outright lies he has leveled at me for the past 20 years. He insists my mother brought criminal charges - in fact, it was a pediatrician who reported the incident to the police based on my firsthand account. He suggests that no one complained of his misconduct prior to his assault on me - court documents show that he was in treatment for what his own therapist described as “inappropriate” behavior with me from as early as 1991. He offers a carefully worded claim that he passed a lie detector test - in fact, he refused to take the test administered by the state police (he hired someone to administer his own test, which authorities refused to accept as evidence). These and other misrepresentations have been rebutted in more detail by independent, highly respected journalists, including this most recent article here:
With all the attempts to misrepresent the facts, it is important to be reminded of the truth contained in court documents from the only final ruling in this case, by the New York Supreme Court in 1992. In denying my father all access to me, that court:
From the bottom of my heart, I will be forever grateful for the outpouring of support I have received from survivors and countless others. If speaking out about my experience can help others stand up to their tormentors, it will be worth the pain and suffering my father continues to inflict on me. Woody Allen has an arsenal of lawyers and publicists but the one thing he does not have on his side is the truth. I hope this is the end of his vicious attacks and of the media campaign by his lawyers and publicists, as he’s promised. I won't let the truth be buried and I won't be silenced.
- Debunked the "experts" my father claims exonerated him, calling them "colored by their loyalty to Mr. Allen", criticizing the author of their report (who never met me) for destroying all supporting documentation, and calling their conclusions "sanitized and therefore less credible".
- Included testimony from babysitters who witnessed inappropriate sexual behavior by my father toward me.
- Found that “there is no credible evidence to support Mr. Allen's contention that Ms. Farrow coached Dylan or that Ms. Farrow acted upon a desire for revenge against him for seducing Soon-Yi. Mr. Allen's resort to the stereotypical ‘woman scorned’ defense is an injudicious attempt to divert attention from his failure to act as a responsible parent and adult.”
- Concluded that the evidence "...proves that Mr. Allen's behavior toward Dylan was grossly inappropriate and that measures must be taken to protect her.”
- Finally, the Connecticut State prosecutor found "probable cause" to prosecute, but made the decision not to in an effort to protect "the child victim", given my fragile state.