<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Updates on the story "Rep Says Angelina Jolie Not Pregnant" on Celebuzz]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Just when the mother of six had inched back into black <a href="http://www.celebuzz.com/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-employ-s59621/" target="_blank">mini-dress territory</a>, <em>InTouch</em> magazine reports that 33-year-old actress <strong>Angelina Jolie </strong>is pregnant once more.<br /><br /><em>Us Weekly</em>, however, has stepped up to yelp at the ankles of the mag, with official comment from Jolie's longtime career manager <strong>Geyer Kosinski</strong>.<br /><br />"Not true," were the words coming from Kosinski. The quote is a simple but relatively powerful point. The rep rarely addresses any tabloid reports regarding Jolie, partner<strong> Brad Pitt</strong>, 45,<strong> </strong>or their children. <br /><br /><em>InTouch</em> ran the speculation that Jolie was carrying another child on their cover, alleging the news spilled at a London restaurant when a waiter tried to slip Angie some alcohol.</p>
<p>Along with the denial, <em>Us</em> has an inside source that says the <em>Changeling</em> star's next project, the <strong>Tom Cruise</strong>-<a href="http://www.celebuzz.com/angelina-jolie-borrows-salt-tom-s38521/" target="_blank">plucked</a> <em>Edwin A. Salt</em>, is on track to start filming in February.</p>
<p>It's better for the action-actress not to be pregnant right now.&#160; A CIA agent rolling around with a baby bump would be a bit tedious, even for unorthodox, thrill-seeking Jolie.</p>]]></description>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.celebuzz.com/rep-says-angelina-jolie-not-s67721/]]></link>
    <language>en-us</language>
	  </channel>
</rss>
