<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Updates on the story "Kim Kardashian: Not Done with 'Playboy'" on Celebuzz]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kim Kardashian</strong>'s alleged vow to never again appear in <em>Playboy</em> isn't all zipped up.</p>
<p>The 28-year-old <em>Dancing with the Stars</em> alum took to her <a href="http://www.kimkardashian.com" target="_blank">official blog</a> this morning to clear the air over an interview with <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,459386,00.html" target="_blank">Fox News</a>, specifically a question regarding her December 2007 cover for <strong>Hugh Hefner</strong>'s mag.</p>
<p>Fox says Kardashian called her holiday spread "<span id="intelliTXT">a one-off," and that "</span>I don't think I'll do <em>Playboy</em> or anything like that again."</p>
<p>Kardashian today said that she would most definitely consider the opportunity if it presented itself again, and that she'd "never say never" to the iconic mag.</p>
<p>While <strong>Reggie Bush</strong>'s main squeeze says she doesn't see herself doing another pictorial in the near future, she's got nothing but love for Hef and the entire Bunny Team.</p>
<p>Maybe the whole <em>Playboy</em> decision will play out in the upcoming season of the E! network's <em>Keeping Up with the Kardashians</em>!</p>
<p>So there you have it&#8212;the naked truth.&#160;</p>]]></description>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.celebuzz.com/kim-kardashian-not-done-playboy-s68721/]]></link>
    <language>en-us</language>
		     <item>
	      <title><![CDATA[Kim wants to do Playboy again]]></title>
	      <link><![CDATA[http://celebslam.celebuzz.com/kim-kardashian-playboy-2/]]></link>
	      <description><![CDATA[If she wants to be taken seriously, Kim needs to turn Playboy down. She needs to concentrate on her career as a  . . . or her . . . ummm . . . what exactly does she do again? On second thought, Playboy may be a good idea.]]></description>
	      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Celebslam]]></dc:creator>
	      <dc:date>2008-12-03T08:40:31Z</dc:date>
	    </item>
		     <item>
	      <title><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian will get naked again]]></title>
	      <link><![CDATA[http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thesuperficial/SNxk/~3/Wb85GsZHk9A/kim_kardashian_will_get_naked.php]]></link>
	      <description><![CDATA[Like any sophisticated woman of poise and dignity, Kim Kardashian wants it to be known she would definitely get all kinds of naked again and be airbrushed by the folks at Playboy. It really is amazing to learn she doesn't live at Buckingham Palace.]]></description>
	      <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Superficial]]></dc:creator>
	      <dc:date>2008-12-03T09:00:00Z</dc:date>
	    </item>
	  </channel>
</rss>
