Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Cast Gains Two More
Looks like the Deathly Hallows are going to get a little more crowded.
Aces Showbiz reports that Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, which is currently being lensed, has added yet two more members to its cast.
Chris Rankin will be reprising his role of Percy Weasley, which he has portrayed since the first installment of the wizard-centric film series in 2001.
Meanwhile, and perhaps more mysteriously, a new Snatcher has been added to the cast. While the particular actor has not yet been confirmed, dancer and stuntman Chase Armitage is said to be filling the role and has allegedly confirmed the gig himself. It’s believed that he will begin filming as one of four Snatchers this month.
Good thing they’re finally nailing down the cast for the flick—after all, it’s not like they’re in the middle of filming already or anything…
Seriously? Like, really?
Harry Potter already has enough Ginger actors… first Rupert, now this guy?
And for those who aren’t hip…. Ginger: A human, characterized by pale skin, freckles and bright red hair. “Gingers” are generally considered to be inferior to their more melanin-rich brethren, and thus deservingly discriminated against. Gingers are thought to have no souls. The condition, “gingervitis” is genetic and incurable.
[quote=noah]Seriously? Like, really?Harry Potter already has enough Ginger actors… first Rupert, now this guy?And for those who aren’t hip…. Ginger: A human, characterized by pale skin, freckles and bright red hair. “Gingers” are generally considered to be inferior to their more melanin-rich brethren, and thus deservingly discriminated against. Gingers are thought to have no souls. The condition, “gingervitis” is genetic and incurable.[/quote]
Uh- hello. Rupert and this guy play brothers….a resemblance isn’t really a stretch then, is it???
[quote=SJF]Uh- hello. Rupert and this guy play brothers….a resemblance isn’t really a stretch then, is it???[/quote]
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
[quote=italianbelanova]how rude[/quote]
I know, right? Casting TWO gingers in one movie is exceptionally rude to those of us who actually have souls. Have they no shame?!
[quote=noah]Seriously? Like, really?Harry Potter already has enough Ginger actors… first Rupert, now this guy?And for those who aren’t hip…. Ginger: A human, characterized by pale skin, freckles and bright red hair. “Gingers” are generally considered to be inferior to their more melanin-rich brethren, and thus deservingly discriminated against. Gingers are thought to have no souls. The condition, “gingervitis” is genetic and incurable.[/quote]
Quit using South Park quotes. You do not sound cool.
Oh, and of course they cast gingers. They play of family that has all red hair. It’s the thing that marks the whole family. If they changed that, any person working on that film would’ve been burned alive.
Some people are OBVIOUSLY not HP fans. If they were they would know the blood-lines, the actors who have portrayed the characters since the outset, and would have the sensible mind-set to keep their fingers from typing junk that makes them look a tad foolish! *some people are IDIOTS* H. Granger
[quote=noah]Seriously? Like, really?Harry Potter already has enough Ginger actors… first Rupert, now this guy?And for those who aren’t hip…. Ginger: A human, characterized by pale skin, freckles and bright red hair. “Gingers” are generally considered to be inferior to their more melanin-rich brethren, and thus deservingly discriminated against. Gingers are thought to have no souls. The condition, “gingervitis” is genetic and incurable.[/quote]
woww….are you stupid
do you know what the harry potter stuff is jeez..he has to be a redhead idiot
Awersome!! Thank goodness they brought back Percy!! And Chase Armitage is a HOTTIE!!!