Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: On-the-Set Pics
May 12, 2009 at 10:15am
As reported yesterday, the cast of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows descended on Freshwater West beach in Wales this week to film scenes relating to the Shell Cottage.
And now we have some more shots of Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and the gang making movie magic by the seaside. From the looks on their faces, it seems that they’re relishing the opportunity to get some fresh air and sunshine while lensing the blockbuster-to-be.
Check out our huge gallery of on-the-set photos and have your say in the comments section: Do you think Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will live up to the previous Harry Potter movies?
I’m not a huge Harry Potter fan, but I feel like some mystique has been lost when you’re main star is no longer a cute & lovable tween-wizard…
Instead, you’ve got a creepy twenty-something man, wearing little kid glasses… which kind of reminds me of that guy who used to lurk around my elementary school playground.
Although, that guy was pretty nice — he always had lots of candy in the back of his van.
Uh – Daniel Radcliffe is nineteen, playing a seventeen year old – hardly a huge age gap …
OMG!!!!!! These pictures made my day! I love the of Bellatriz pointing out the wand!
Still 9 weeks to the release of the Half Blood Prince… I CAN’T WAIT ANY LONGER!!!!!!!
[quote=Emma]Uh – Daniel Radcliffe is nineteen, playing a seventeen year old – hardly a huge age gap …[/quote]
He’ll be 20 years old in 2 months. Regardless of the gap, he looks out of place. They should cast someone else in the next one.
[quote=noah]
He’ll be 20 years old in 2 months. Regardless of the gap, he looks out of place. They should cast someone else in the next one.[/quote]
Wow… that must be the stupidest [sic] thing I’ve heard today.
[quote=Wow]Wow… that must be the stupidest [sic] thing I’ve heard today.[/quote]
No stupider than casting a 20-year-old that looks like he’s a creepy 35 year old to play a boy-wizard. Suck on those hogwarts.
“He’ll be 20 years old in 2 months. Regardless of the gap, he looks out of place. They should cast someone else in the next one.”
I’m sorry to tell you but if you read the title it says Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, so that means its de last book and movie, the won’t cast someone else just for the last one, fans would get mad.
Excuse me Emma but are you serious? 19 and 20 are totally different. I will have to agree with that Noah dude. At 19 my deadlift was no where near my deadlift at 20. So ya know, a lot can happen. Your better is looking weak Emma.
[quote=Lila]I’m sorry to tell you but if you read the title it says Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, so that means its de last book and movie, the won’t cast someone else just for the last one, fans would get mad.[/quote]
No Lila, I’m sorry to tell you: they should recast his role.
So many Hollywood actors would be a better fit: Bob Saget, Sly Stallone, Danny DeVito, etc.
if they cast someone else for daniel ,they must look for new ron.because rupert is 21 years old.and he looks very grown up.therefor please stop jealous
And what you think about Zac Effron 22 years old who playing eternal teenager ?
But like i suppose you never open a HP book in your life you can understand why Harry (17) is looking like they make looking Dan on set .
At the end of the last Harry Potter Harry is 35 years old !
You know HP book is the story about a boy who is GROWNING it’s not an Disney story
[quote=marion]if they cast someone else for daniel ,they must look for new ron.because rupert is 21 years old.and he looks very grown up.[/quote]
I agree with you on looking for someone new for Ron/Rupert … not because he looks grown up, but more for the reason that he’s a Ginger and has no soul.
[quote=@lila]And what you think about Zac Effron 22 years old who playing eternal teenager ?[/quote]
Well, Zac Efron is a dreamboat, so that solves that debate. OOH! They should cast him instead of Daniel Radcliffe. Maybe I’d go see the movie if that was the case.
Efron as Potter 2010!
just don’t respond to noah, he’s nothing but a troll, and a lousy troll at that.
[quote=acd]just don’t respond to noah, he’s nothing but a troll, and a lousy troll at that.[/quote]
Troll?! I’m no troll. Perhaps a goblin, or maybe an elf, but never a troll.
im a fan eversince i happen to passed by in a local bookstore displaying the Harry Potter series.