Lindsay Lohan Passes on ‘Playboy’
Sep 5, 2008 at 2:59pm
Lindsay Lohan has at least one thing in common with Rihanna—besides a questionable romantic life, of course. As it turns out, neither of them will be stripping down for Playboy magazine.
The New York Post says that LiLo has rebuffed a $700,000 offer to pose for an eight-page spread in the venerable skin mag’s 55th-anniversary issue in January.
The busy-fingered blogger‘s rep told Playboy creative consultant Hal Lifson, “If there’s nudity, then the answer’s no.”
Lifson had envisioned a pictorial tribute to ’60s cinematic sex pot Ann-Margret.
What gives, Linds? Even your kid sister Ali has been cozying up to the porn crowd lately.
Then again, with Lohan walking around in public like this, is a Playboy spread really necessary?
I mean, she’s already become a lesbian which multiplied my fantasy-bank by at least 3x … baby steps people, baby steps.
Christ, we’ve already seen all of it…what’s left to show…the inside of her esophagus?
What’s her effing problem?
She has a bad attitude.
eh, how hard is it find nude pics of her anyways?
Oh, passes on Playboy. I misread that one and was expecting some sort of Chuck Berry action.
It’s uncanny, but Lindsay Lohan looks just like a girl I once broke up with because her tan kept smearing off on my boxers.
Well, we have seen it all, but I would like to see again, maybe she will change her mind!