family

Michael Jackson: The Kids Were Not His Sons (or his Daughter)

by Celebuzz on Jun. 30, 2009 10:00 AM / 53 Comments

Holy paternity shocker!

TMZ reports that, not only is Michael Jackson not the biological father of his three children, Michael Jr. (publicly referred to as "Prince"), Paris and Prince Michael II, but his ex-wife Debbie Rowe, who carried Michael Jr. and Paris to term, is not those boys' biological mother!

The Web site reveals that Rowe's eggs were not used in the in-vitro fertilizations and she served merely as a surrogate. Meanwhile, Jackson's sperm was not used in any of the three conceptions.

Prince Michael II was carried by a separate, anonymous surrogate, who was apparently never told the identity of the "receiving parent"—in this case, Jackson.

"Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael," says TMZ.

So if Jacko wasn't the true father of his kids, who is? In the case of Michael Jr. and daughter Prince, Us Magazine claims that the sperm donor was Jackson's Los Angeles-based dermatologist, Arnold Klein.

"[Klein] is the dad," a Jackson insider tells the mag. "He and Debbie signed an agreement saying they would never reveal the truth."

Wow; lots of twisted roots in that family tree.

Have your say in the comments section: Are you surprised to hear that Jackson isn't the biological father to his children?

Next Story / Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick Debut Twins!

Also In Family /

Comments / 1-10 of 53

Sort Oldest First

Jezzy 4 mos ago
Reply

Seriously he's passed away stop reporting all this news the guys dead leave it at that.
jjcstitus 4 mos ago
Reply

Why can't we just let him rest in peace and not dissect his life or his children's lives like this?! It's no ones business :(
noah 4 mos ago
Reply

ALRIGHT! I'll come clean:

I am the real father to Michael Jackson's children.

I was young, needed the money, and was approached by his people on the street one day (because I'm so gorgeous, obviously).

There. I said it. Now please return Prince, Paris and Prince II to their rightful father. Daddy misses them. XOXO
Miranda 4 mos ago
Reply

This is just a big load of BS everyone who has ever seen those kids sees that they are definitely MJ's kids. This is disrespecting a remarcable man and the people who made up this rumour are pathetic and should be ashamed.
WHO CARES 4 mos ago
Reply

SO WHAT IF MJ DIDNT WANT TO USE HIS SPERM FOR THOSE KIDS HE STILL RAISED AND TOOK CARE OF THEY WERE FROM HIM SO WHO CARES. ITS JUS A DIFFERENT FORM OF ADOPTION. LET MJ RIP.
robson shakespier 4 mos ago
Reply

Bom michael jackeson foi e sera um exemplo de astro Michael eu nunca vou deixar de ser seu fã vc foi um xemplo pra mim.
Tyrone 4 mos ago
Reply

Yeah those kids would be darker if they were his...and not have light colored eyes...sorry to sound like a racist...but come on!
Superstar 4 mos ago
Reply

Let me say something to everybody!!! The real father was and will be Michael Jackson... Father is not just the one that puts the sperm is the one that takes care of the baby(ies). That's what I called being a father....
Barb 4 mos ago
Reply

Not surprising at all. Those children neither look like Jackson nor have any of his dark features. And for those who think he was still their "daddy" even though he was not their natural father, what kind of life did those children live having their heads covered in public and whooshed from place to place to escape Jackson fans. Michael's death is sad, but those children need a stable, normal home.
Mimi 4 mos ago
Reply

My friends are siblings and their dad is black and their mom is white. The oldest one who is as old as me she is also as white as me, and both my parents are white, her little sister is just as dark as her dad. Just like my hair is blonde and my brother's is red. But my dad's is black and my mom's is blonde. It's genetics. Read a book.