Stars React To Prop 8 Ruling

Joel said:

Wow glen, you're right. I should move to a place where my "stupid, selfish, and bigoted" views on marriage are welcome and in the majority. Hmm, Let's see, California, Florida, New York, Illinois, Washington, 40 other US states. I heard Europe is nice too. England, France, Germany, Italy. In fact, my views are the norm most places in the world. You Glen, are a shame to your cause. Your attempt at an inalienable rights defense was sorry and unconvincing. And your hate speech is disgusting and hypocritical. Say no to hate! Say yes to defending marriage! 

You absolutly fail to understand that majority rule is irrevelant when human rights are being violated. That is why the surpreme court was able to desegregate schools in the 1960's despite the majority disapproval in the southern states.

I appreciate your response, because you've show me that you're incapable of refuting the points i've made. You would rather attack me than the message.

I hate to be the one to break the news to all of the people that are against same sex marriage!

Turns out this country follows the Constitution, not the Bible! If our founding fathers got together and came up with the Bible, then maybe we would all be responsible for looking at this situation in a different way, but since they came up with the Constitution, the part where "all men are created equal" is stated, should be inforced, no exceptions!

I promise you, there is no way to kill off homosexuals, turns out majority of homosexuals are born that way!

Ok, Glen, I will attack your message.
To start out you said that gay marriage does not infringe on my inalienable rights but banning it infringes on those of the homosexuals.
First of all, the status of gay marriage does not affect the life or liberty of anyone. We are all still alive and free, those liberties are not infringed. You may argue that it affects their pursuit of happiness. I would argue that the happiness of a gay relationship does not depend on whether they are legally married or not. I would also argue that imposing gay marriage against the will of the people would negatively impact their happiness and that radically altering the fundamental institution of marriage would negatively affect the happiness of society as a whole.
Your second claim, first of all, comparing sexual orientation does not equal race. An example, having separate bathrooms for blacks and whites in unconstitutional, having separate bathrooms for men and women is perfectly fine. Gender matters.
You are also wrong when you say that the majority does not matter when human rights are concerned. This is wrong because rights are ultimately defined by the people. The supreme court was able to desegregate schools because those violated rights established by the people. Not because they created some new right, as the Cali court justices did. Also, people have the right to vote and to amend their constitution. So I ask you, Glen, is it fair to uphold the so-called "rights" of gays at the expense of the rights of everyone else? I

Hey Joel,
I loved your rant. It was fabulous attempt at trying to sound educated on the matter but unfortunately you're just closed minded bigot.
Have a nice day.